Adopt a clear strategy and policy for open standards

Follow:

  • RSS
  • Cite

    Cite

    APA

    Open Government, Government of Canada. (2014, August 6). Adopt a clear strategy and policy for open standards. Retrieved from http://open.canada.ca/en/adopt_a_clear_strategy_and_policy_for_open_standards
    MLA

    “Adopt a clear strategy and policy for open standards.” Open Government, Government of Canada, 6 August 2014, http://open.canada.ca/en/adopt_a_clear_strategy_and_policy_for_open_standards
    (Report an issue with citation)
Submitted By
Jean Bernatchez
Votes: 62

While the Government of Canada (GC) is moving ahead with the idea of open data, I think the GC is missing a significant related strategy. Other governments that have taken a leading role in developing their open data policies also address the importance of Open Information and Communication Technologies Standards.

Looking at the Government of Canada Chief Information Officer Branch or the shared services agency, I found no evidence of a policy or strategy for this. Many references to the need for standardization, but what does that mean? Simply eliminating choices by standardizing on existing GC solutions that are most prevalent? From the

2009 Directive on Management of Information Technology, it does appear someone had the idea: "Aligning departmental IT management practices, processes and technology architecture with federal government strategy, directions, standards and guidelines as they become available and as they evolve under the guidance of the Chief Information Officers Council". But where is the meat, 5 years later?

Perhaps we should follow UK's lead as they have well articulated published strategies and policies. And they make their documents available under a permissive license. I think we should make an effort to examine, adapt, translate and adopt these. Knowing the benefits from the adoption of open standards (and the UK documents explain this well), this should not be ignored any longer, risking the efforts for cost savings from IT consolidation not realizing the potential due to a lack of adoption of open information and communications technologies (ICT) standards, and risking not fully realizing the opportunities from open data due to vendor lock-ins or licensing issues in implementing solutions utilizing the available data.

The UK and many EU member states have adopted policies to give preferences to ICT standards developed in an open collaborative and transparent process and available royalty free. We should do the same and benefit from a better and clearer government IT strategy.

UK References:

- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/one-year-on-implementing-the-government-ict-strategy

- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-principles/open-standards-principles

- https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/technology/open-data.html

- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/open-document-formats-selected-to-meet-user-needs

- https://www.gov.uk/service-manual

Add new comment

About text formats
Rules of Engagement

We look forward to hearing from you. Your ideas and feedback are central to the development of both the Open Government portal and the Government of Canada’s approach to Open Government.

While comments are moderated, the portal will not censor any comments except in a few specific cases, listed below. Accounts acting contrary to these rules may be temporarily or permanently disabled.

Comments and Interaction

Our team will read comments and participate in discussions when appropriate. Your comments and contributions must be relevant and respectful.

Our team will not engage in partisan or political issues or respond to questions that violate these Terms and Conditions.

Our team reserves the right to remove comments and contributions, and to block users based on the following criteria:

The comments or contributions:

  • include personal, protected or classified information of the Government of Canada or infringes upon intellectual property or proprietary rights
  • are contrary to the principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982
  • are racist, hateful, sexist, homophobic or defamatory, or contain or refer to any obscenity or pornography
  • are threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing
  • are contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • are written in a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

Our team cannot commit to replying to every message or comment, but we look forward to continuing the conversation whenever possible. Please note that responses will be provided in the same language that was used in the original comment.

Our team will reply to comments in the official language in which they are posted. If we determine the response is a question of general public interest, we will respond in both official languages.