Global Leadership in Open Government is Canadian

November 30, 2017


  • RSS
  • Cite

As you may know, Canada recently accepted a new leadership role with the Open Government Partnership (OGP) as co-chair for a one-year term. Last week, I represented our country in this role by participating in the OGP’s Americas Regional Meeting in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

This meeting was an opportunity for OGP members, civil society organizations, academics and citizens to come together and learn from each other, and strengthen bilateral and regional partnerships.

Some of the big questions I focused on were:  

  • How can government encourage citizen participation through open government?
  • How can we demonstrate the real-world results of our open government efforts?
  • And, now that we’re lead government co-chair of the OGP for 2018-19, as well as supporting government co-chair for 2017-18, what does our new international leadership role look like?

Canada’s new leadership role

During this meeting, I shared stories Canadians are familiar with: how we’re opening the doors for Canadians to see our once-secret Ministerial mandate letters, and report on how far we’ve come in keeping the promises we made. I also discussed how we’ve proposed important legislative changes to our Access to Information Act to make it easier to get government information.

While accomplishments like these led to our new leadership role, the meeting also reminded me that this is about much more than Canada’s successes. It’s about stepping up to support other countries on their own open government journeys, and investing in the success of modern democracies around the world.

Our priorities

I also shared the key themes Canada will bring to the co-chair role, and I’ve talked about these in an earlier blog. These priorities reflect the challenges facing the global open government community, and are shaped by the experiences of former OGP co-chairs.

They are:

  • Inclusion, which means enabling under-represented citizens, regardless of gender, race, or sexual orientation, to participate actively in policy-making. Anything less is unhealthy for democracy.
  • Participation, which is about developing public policy in partnership with citizens, or creating opportunities for people to get involved, which leads to more trust in government and better policy outcomes.
  • Impact, which is about making it easier for citizens to understand how our work in open government affects their day-to-day lives. This makes government accountable for results and puts the focus on initiatives that make a difference.

Going digital grows open government

As we think about the effects of our work on Canadians, it’s hard not to recognize the close link between open government and digital technology. Producing results on the ground really means digging into our understanding of how well our current digital services respond to citizens’ needs, and how we can do better.

To move open government forward, we need thoughtfully designed digital services that puts citizens first and brings Canadians closer to their Government.

Global responsibilities

Of course, the leadership expectations for Canada have never been higher — and that’s how it should be. Because the ultimate goal of the Partnership is to use Open Government to create and better lives for people the world-over, which is something Canada can get behind.

We’re looking forward to the next two years.

The Honourable Scott Brison is the President of the Treasury Board.

Minister Brison, the Member of Parliament for Kings–Hants (Nova Scotia), has been elected to Canada’s House of Commons in seven general elections. He was a key spokesperson on economic issues and served as the Critic for Finance as well as Vice-Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance.

He served as Minister of Public Works and Government Services, and Receiver General of Canada, and was the youngest member of Prime Minister Paul Martin’s Cabinet. He also served on three Cabinet committees: Treasury Board, Domestic Affairs and Expenditure Review.

Add new comment

Rules of Engagement

We look forward to hearing from you. Your ideas and feedback are central to the development of both the Open Government portal and the Government of Canada’s approach to Open Government.

While comments are moderated, the portal will not censor any comments except in a few specific cases, listed below. Accounts acting contrary to these rules may be temporarily or permanently disabled.

Comments and Interaction

Our team will read comments and participate in discussions when appropriate. Your comments and contributions must be relevant and respectful.

Our team will not engage in partisan or political issues or respond to questions that violate these Terms and Conditions.

Our team reserves the right to remove comments and contributions, and to block users based on the following criteria:

The comments or contributions:

  • include personal, protected or classified information of the Government of Canada or infringes upon intellectual property or proprietary rights
  • are contrary to the principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982
  • are racist, hateful, sexist, homophobic or defamatory, or contain or refer to any obscenity or pornography
  • are threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing
  • are contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • are written in a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

Our team cannot commit to replying to every message or comment, but we look forward to continuing the conversation whenever possible. Please note that responses will be provided in the same language that was used in the original comment.

Our team will reply to comments in the official language in which they are posted. If we determine the response is a question of general public interest, we will respond in both official languages.


Submitted by Peter Karwacki on March 12, 2018 - 12:41 AM

There is a race on to digitize but digital is not better if the user does not get value. Suppose you digitized the bible, would more read it or believe it? Recommendations for open data OPEN Data Management pitfalls. #1 Executive Sponsor Missing #2 Skipping the Business Case urgent problems and needs are, or how to quantify the benefits of ODM, follow the “Five Whys” approach. When your users complain about a data quality issue, ask “why”. Listen to the answer and ask “why” again. Continue until you’ve drilled all the way down to the root causes. Then, ask questions about how much the issue is costing the business. #3 Setting Up ODM as a “Big Bang” Initiative with an unmanageable scope #4 Failing to Plan for Organizational and Cultural Change Spending time on the people, processes and practices. start with the people, politics and culture; then address data governance practices and processes. #5 Taking a One-Dimensional Approach #6 Underrating the Importance of a Data Governance Group #7 No Metrics for Measuring Success “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.” #8Choice of technology Open data hub Tools for data integration, profiling and quality Data governance tools Interoperability Workflow management Ease of use — different UIs for technical and business roles Scalability and high performance / high availability

Submitted by Shelley D. Chuchmuch on February 13, 2018 - 7:09 AM

I think that this is a wonderful initiative. How can I become involved as a Citizen, Educator, Researcher and non-profit organization? Can we collaborate together to create accessible technology?

Submitted by Carol Lever on December 12, 2017 - 2:23 AM

The progress that we are making together is nothing short of impressive. I think that societal participation will increase dramatically, now that we can actually reach out and discuss issues of interest directly with government representatives. Thank you for this great accomplishment, and Merry Christmas to All.