Open Government, and the 4th Industrial Revolution

January 26, 2016


  • RSS
  • Cite

This blog post was written by Stephen Walker and Jose Alonso, co-chairs of the Open Government Partnership Open Data Working Group. It was originally posted on the World Economic Forum website.

Two weeks ago in Davos, industry and government leaders considered the challenges that lie ahead as we enter a period of rapid innovation and change unlike any the world has known before.

Executive Chairman of WEF Klaus Schwab made a number of observations about the increasing importance of data and connectivity in realising the 4th Industrial Revolution and singled out one of the key demands facing government in this next wave of industrialisation: increased public pressure for transparency.

If [governments] prove capable of embracing a world of disruptive change, subjecting their structures to the levels of transparency and efficiency that will enable them to maintain their competitive edge, they will endure. If they cannot evolve, they will face increasing trouble.

We agree. Much has been said of the potential of data to revolutionise business and relationships. But data will only get us so far on its own. We also need it to be relevant, timely, and usable.

Above all, we need data to be open.

Open data will be a crucial tool for governments to meet the transparency and efficiency challenges highlighted at WEF. This is why, to the greatest extent possible, government data should be open: freely accessible, presented in a format that is comparable and reusable and, ideally, released in a timely manner.

Not only will governments that embrace open data improve their public accountability and efficiency, they will also reap the social and economic benefits of opening up data for citizens. Instead of languishing in a ministry or agency computer system to be viewed by a handful of officials, the data can be accessed and used by citizens to drive entrepreneurship, innovation and social problem solving - increasing its economic and social value exponentially. This is why open government data will be a determining factor on which countries are at the forefront of the 4th Industrial Revolution.

For example, in Canada the national government releases datasets on charitable and non-profit organizations. A Montreal-based software company, Ajah, then uses that data to power its Fundtracker program, which in turn allows organizations to research potential donors and identify funding trends. This is just one way in which open data can be reused to generate greater social and economic benefits than if it were used by government officials alone.

To date, only limited progress has been made globally on releasing open government data sets. The most recent Open Data Barometer shows only 8% of governments covered by the Barometer release open data on government spending. In terms of public service delivery, only 12% of governments share open data on the performance of public education, and only 7% of governments release corresponding open data on health services. We need to go much further if governments are to evolve and adapt to the next wave of industrialisation.

Imagine how anti-corruption efforts could be advanced, and what efficiencies could be made, if all governments shared open data on public spending. Imagine how much faster services like education and health could be improved if industry experts and citizens using these services could analyse and use the data to identify gaps and to then pilot solutions.

In many cities and countries, the open data revolution is already underway. In Uruguay, provides direct access to all performance indicators of the country’s health services. From waiting times to user ratings, data on health services can be compared and citizens can make informed decisions on healthcare providers. Investigative journalists have already found anomalies in some of the data provided, and this has encouraged private healthcare providers to standardise and improve their data collection. Examples like this could be the rule rather than the exception if we embrace an open data future.

This is why we launched the international Open Data Charter. The Charter, based on six core principles, guides governments in their commitment to adopt and implement shared open data principles, standards, and best practices across sectors and around the world.

Governed by lead stewards from government and civil society, the Open Data Charter aims to support as many local, regional, and national governments as possible to adopt and implement the principles. To date, the Charter has been adopted by 17 governments and we encourage all governments to seize this opportunity to be at the forefront of the open data revolution.

It is clear today that calls for more efficient and transparent government will not subside. A government that wishes meet the challenges that lie ahead, and to capitalize on technology and innovation as drivers of the 4th Industrial Revolution, can only achieve these goals through meaningful commitment to open data. As citizens’ expectations evolve and rapid technological advancements continue, “openness” will cease to be optional for governments.

Open data will enable governments to not only survive but excel as innovators in the next phase of industrialisation. It is a revolution whose time has truly come, and there is no better time than now for governments to be a part of it.

Add new comment

Rules of Engagement

We look forward to hearing from you. Your ideas and feedback are central to the development of both the Open Government portal and the Government of Canada’s approach to Open Government.

While comments are moderated, the portal will not censor any comments except in a few specific cases, listed below. Accounts acting contrary to these rules may be temporarily or permanently disabled.

Comments and Interaction

Our team will read comments and participate in discussions when appropriate. Your comments and contributions must be relevant and respectful.

Our team will not engage in partisan or political issues or respond to questions that violate these Terms and Conditions.

Our team reserves the right to remove comments and contributions, and to block users based on the following criteria:

The comments or contributions:

  • include personal, protected or classified information of the Government of Canada or infringes upon intellectual property or proprietary rights
  • are contrary to the principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982
  • are racist, hateful, sexist, homophobic or defamatory, or contain or refer to any obscenity or pornography
  • are threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing
  • are contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • are written in a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

Our team cannot commit to replying to every message or comment, but we look forward to continuing the conversation whenever possible. Please note that responses will be provided in the same language that was used in the original comment.

Our team will reply to comments in the official language in which they are posted. If we determine the response is a question of general public interest, we will respond in both official languages.


Submitted by Rose Leonard on October 13, 2022 - 1:41 PM

Le Gouvernement est un panier percé, en ce qui concerne les citoyens et top secret les pots de vin, bref tout ce qui est frauduleux est top secret, payé par nos taxes.

Submitted by La Corriveau on May 27, 2022 - 10:20 PM

I am all for it as long as the open database does not impede on individual rights to privacy by requiring individual’s data and/or personal information in order to operate.

Submitted by RealityoftheSi… on May 10, 2021 - 11:42 PM

Gee, Bill C-10 certainly is not something that promotes "transparency". So the "Great Reset - 4th Industrial Revolution" was already be prepared as early as Jan 26, 2016, just needed a little "virus" to get the ball rolling. Interesting.

Submitted by R.P.D. Vanderkam on September 22, 2016 - 7:08 PM

Better late than never, Canada. Let's also hope it's not too little, too late. If opening data and information to the public gives a country an advantage(*), and it should, it will also be a boost to the success of the west vs the rest who do not start from the same premises of individual freedoms. *but I recognise the proviso about the need for open tools from the comment here from "Open Data & Open source".

Submitted by Dr Jacques Ger… on June 23, 2016 - 4:18 PM

Que de belles paroles. Ça fait 3 ans que je demande ma pension de vieillesse et le supplément sans succès. Je dois vivre dans des maisons de sans-abri AU CANADA... Les fonctionnaires responsables sont atteints de Paranoia collective. On ne peut pas les voir. C'est ridicule, ils s'identifient par un prénom au téléphone seulement. Ils n'ont aucune responsabilité de leurs actes car ils ne sont membre d'aucune Association ou Ordre professionnel.

Submitted by Open Data & Op… on May 03, 2016 - 3:26 PM

One of the core assumptions of open data is that there will be open source tools to parse, modify & publish the results of the analysis. Data will only be accessible, comparable & timely for all if there are free and open source tools with which to use it. A lot can be learned from open by default policies of other governments: