Comments on Canada’s Action Plan on Open Government 2016–18

Follow:

  • RSS
  • Cite
Submitted By
LIndsey Bertrand
Tags
Votes: 31

To whom it may concern:
The BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association (FIPA) is a non-profit society established in 1991 for the purpose of advancing freedom of information, open and accountable government, and privacy rights in Canada. We serve a wide variety of individuals and organizations through programs of public education, legal aid, research, public interest advocacy and law reform.
Although we are based in British Columbia, FIPA has maintained an active role on the federal scene as well. We thank you for this opportunity to participate in the consultation on Canada’s Action Plan for Open Government 2016-18.

In this brief submission, we argue that although initiatives in the field of ‘open data’ are important for transparency, they cannot take the place of action to repair our seriously crippled Access to Information (ATI) system. We discuss ATI reform in greater depth in our submission to the Treasury Board’s consultations on the Access to Information Act (ATIA), and in our recent presentation to the House of Commons Access to Information, Ethics and Privacy Committee (ETHI).

FIPA is supportive of efforts to increase routine disclosure of information by government and public bodies. Public democratic engagement and policy development can be helped by making more—and better— information available to everyone.  As we have written before, FIPA holds that ‘Open Government’—defined as the enhanced availability of data to the public through electronic means— can allow for better research, better input to public consultations, and improved representations of members of the public to government. However if not properly considered, open government does have its pitfalls. For one, since public officials are the ones choosing what to publish, it is possible for government to publish only favourable or non-controversial content, or to publish in manners that are inaccessible, unmanipulable, or otherwise difficult to use.

As we submitted in 2011 , “no one wants to head toward a dystopia where governments push out information electronically which no one uses or trusts, while occasional Wikileaks-type document dumps raise the risk of serious damage to legitimate state, business, or personal interests.”

A more robust access to information system would go a ways toward mitigating this. While routine disclosure—the push of information from government to citizens—should be the primary method of information release, access to information plays the crucial role of providing citizens with the ability to pull information from government in a way that balances information rights with legitimate requirements for confidentiality in certain clearly defined, limited circumstances.
The government’s announcement of its intention to release information in user-friendly formats wherever possible is a useful initiative, and we welcome it.

As we make long-overdue moves toward routine release of information, we must ensure that Canadians have a functional system to request access to specific information that may otherwise be left out – especially when that information puts a check on state power or use of public funds, or when it is in the public interest.

With respect,

Lindsey Bertrand
Program Director
BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association
 

Add new comment

Rules of Engagement

We look forward to hearing from you. Your ideas and feedback are central to the development of both the Open Government portal and the Government of Canada’s approach to Open Government.

While comments are moderated, the portal will not censor any comments except in a few specific cases, listed below. Accounts acting contrary to these rules may be temporarily or permanently disabled.

Comments and Interaction

Our team will read comments and participate in discussions when appropriate. Your comments and contributions must be relevant and respectful.

Our team will not engage in partisan or political issues or respond to questions that violate these Terms and Conditions.

Our team reserves the right to remove comments and contributions, and to block users based on the following criteria:

The comments or contributions:

  • include personal, protected or classified information of the Government of Canada or infringes upon intellectual property or proprietary rights
  • are contrary to the principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982
  • are racist, hateful, sexist, homophobic or defamatory, or contain or refer to any obscenity or pornography
  • are threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing
  • are contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • are written in a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

Our team cannot commit to replying to every message or comment, but we look forward to continuing the conversation whenever possible. Please note that responses will be provided in the same language that was used in the original comment.

Our team will reply to comments in the official language in which they are posted. If we determine the response is a question of general public interest, we will respond in both official languages.