Establish a multi-stakeholder forum

Follow:

  • RSS
  • Cite
Submitted By
James McKinney
Tags
Votes: 21

Within the Open Government Partnership, government and civil society are
intended to be partners and co-creators of the National Action Plan.

To achieve this, over 30 OGP countries use multi-stakeholder forums. The
forums provide a permanent dialogue mechanism between government and civil
society, participating as equal partners in agreeing the National Action Plan
and planning and monitoring in its implementation. For additional context, we
are sending via email an OGP draft document describing these forums.

To date, the Government of Canada has been going through each stage of the
OGP process unilaterally, without the active participation and collaboration
of civil society.

To remedy this, on March 29, we launched the Canadian Open Government Civil
Society Network (http://www.opengovdialogue.ca). Our purpose is to establish
a permanent dialogue mechanism and to engage more civil society organizations
in the OGP. Since then, 26 organizations have signed the letter of intent
(attached with signatories).

To lead the network, an interim steering committee was formed. Its members
are:

Gail Davidson, Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada
David Fewer, Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
Jean-Noé Landry, Open North
Michael Lenczner, Powered by Data
James McKinney
Toby Mendel, Centre for Law and Democracy
Sukanya Pillay, Canadian Civil Liberties Association

After discussions and meetings with civil servants in the Treasury Board
Secretariat, we are submitting a proposal for a multi-stakeholder forum
(attached).

In preparing this proposal, we spoke with civil society representatives in
countries with permanent dialogue mechanisms, we spoke with the OGP Support
Unit to learn about other countries’ experiences, we built on the resources
they provided, and we integrated their feedback to our proposal.

Many OGP countries have formed multi-stakeholder forums through executive
decrees and similar instruments. Canada’s forum should be formed through an
Order-in-Council, to protect it from easily becoming inactive through, for
example, the neglect of a new government after an election. We can provide
sample orders from other countries.

We look forward to further refining this proposal in the next phase of the
consultation on the OGP National Action Plan in June.

Regards,

James McKinney, on behalf of the Interim Steering Committee of the Canadian
Open Government Civil Society Network

Attachments:
Letter of intent with signatories:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7gRCWnI02hoVGJRSm9KUW81eUE
Proposal for a multi-stakeholder forum:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=17FHRwSqjYzBF9BqUq-mRvFsMAoRw2jRBQg-Cadbx0SE

Add new comment

Rules of Engagement

We look forward to hearing from you. Your ideas and feedback are central to the development of both the Open Government portal and the Government of Canada’s approach to Open Government.

While comments are moderated, the portal will not censor any comments except in a few specific cases, listed below. Accounts acting contrary to these rules may be temporarily or permanently disabled.

Comments and Interaction

Our team will read comments and participate in discussions when appropriate. Your comments and contributions must be relevant and respectful.

Our team will not engage in partisan or political issues or respond to questions that violate these Terms and Conditions.

Our team reserves the right to remove comments and contributions, and to block users based on the following criteria:

The comments or contributions:

  • include personal, protected or classified information of the Government of Canada or infringes upon intellectual property or proprietary rights
  • are contrary to the principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982
  • are racist, hateful, sexist, homophobic or defamatory, or contain or refer to any obscenity or pornography
  • are threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing
  • are contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • are written in a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

Our team cannot commit to replying to every message or comment, but we look forward to continuing the conversation whenever possible. Please note that responses will be provided in the same language that was used in the original comment.

Our team will reply to comments in the official language in which they are posted. If we determine the response is a question of general public interest, we will respond in both official languages.

Comments

Submitted by Bruce Cuthbert on May 13, 2016 - 6:43 AM

We cannot afford the overhead to have each civic engagement connect to the public. We also need to be able to connect people together based on their location in Canada and based on their interests at all levels of government.

Submitted by Bruce Cuthbert on May 13, 2016 - 6:41 AM

We need federal government to help connect at provincial and local levels as well. We need online civic engagement to be a new way for everyone to help make all of our governments better. Currently we have silo thinking at each level of government. see my previous comment as well.

Submitted by Bruce Cuthbert on May 13, 2016 - 6:39 AM

PlaceSpeak.com, developed to Ontario Privacy Commisioner PrivacyByDesign standards by Vancouver company, could be used to connect with open government as well as to connect to the 4 levels of government for civic engagement and to allow neighbourhoods and streets to connect. Every poll, survey, discussions from any of these groups at all levels of government builds the group for all future polls, surveys, discussions. We need a new way to connect for open government that works at all levels otherwise every civic engagement starts over and we will continue to miss the opportunity and miss involving people that are interested in making Canada, our provinces, our municipalities and our rural communities better.