About this information
Search the summaries of completed Access to Information (ATI) requests to find information about ATI requests made to the Government of Canada after January 2020. If you find a summary of interest, you can request a copy of the records at no cost using the form below each summary. Requests made through this form are considered informal requests and are not subject to the same requirements as requests under the Access to Information Act (ATIA).
If you don’t find what you are looking for you can request additional government records under an institution’s control by contacting the institution’s Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator or by submitting a formal access to information request.
*All information provided will incorporate the necessary exemptions and exclusions as per the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act.
Download datasets of the summaries of completed access to information requests.
Current Search
Report Type
Organization
Disposition
Year
Month
Found 827 record(s)
Req # A-2019-00033
Time frame: Feb 7, 2019 to Jan 3, 2020. Final versions of records relating to the federal or Nova Scotia provincial environmental assessment process for the replacement effluent treatment facility project proposed by Northern Pulp Nova Scotia Corporation (the "Project"), including but not limited to correspondence relating to Northern Pulp's focus report for the Project (submitted October 2, 2019 to the Province of Nova Scotia) among representatives or employees of the Government of Canada, and between any of the foregoing and other governments, consultants, entities or individuals, exclusive of correspondence between the Government of Canada and Northern Pulp Nova Scotia CorporationOrganization: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada
May 2020
May 2020
Req # A-2020-00002
On April 24, 2020, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada ("Agency") announced its decision that an impact assessment is not required for the Prairie Lights Power Project (the "Project") located in Alberta. Please provide all records (including, but not limited to, memorandums, briefing notes, research papers, reports, letters, department manuals, decision-making tools and meeting minutes) relevant to the Agency's decision that an impact assessment is not required for the Project. Please also provide any other records or information referred to or relied on by the Agency when taking into account the factors at subsection 16(2) of the Impact Assessment Act relevant to the Project.Organization: Impact Assessment Agency of Canada
May 2020
Req # A-2019-00130
Confirmation document, email sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering the Safety Areas mentioned in the Detailed Event Report for the event that occurred 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant for the following three instances, id es: (i) Safety Areas covering: (ii) Shutdown Systems and Safety Systems, and (iii) Training Program(s).Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00132
Clarified text on April 17, 2020: Emails were to be sent to Specialist(s), as follows: Safety Systems, Training Programs, Human Factors, and Quality Assurance. The causes identified in the preliminary and detailed reports describes a minimum number of specialist(s) that should have been informed via email of the Event by providing to them the R-99. We are reiterating our requests, as follows: Emails that forwarded the R-99 to specialists, Proof of receipt of emails to specialist, title of Experts, and Division to which they were attached to. In addition, kindly provide the ID Tag Number( specific identification, unique number) of the failed relay. Original text: Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Maintenance Program (Relays), deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00131
Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Shutdown System(s) and Safety Systems, deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00103
Provide January 1, 2019 to present, review of the handling work of Canada’s federally-owned radioactive waste by a private-sector consortium and options to consider as the renewal date in 2021 is near, including other options that store radioactive waste away from drinking water sources. Include permits given and rationales for and risk assessments done for transporting radioactive wastes to Chalk River and other sites, and to storing wastes at Chalk River. Include as well results to date from an environmental review of Global First Power plans for modular reactor at Chalk River and questions CNSC sent to them in the last 3 months.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00108
All records provided to or created by the president regarding the Pickering nuclear generating station from Jan. 1, 2020 to the date this request was received.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00123
For the years 2007 and 2008, the Gentilly II CNSC Site Office Inspector Report regarding the Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant activities for years 2007 and 2008. Please note that terminology used in this request is standard nuclear industry terminology.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00125
Detailed Report filed at Gentilly II CNSC Site Office or provided to any CNSC Officer about events that occurred on October 27, 2009. Please note that terminology used in this request is standard nuclear industry terminology.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
April 2020