About this information
Search the summaries of completed Access to Information (ATI) requests to find information about ATI requests made to the Government of Canada after January 2020. If you find a summary of interest, you can request a copy of the records at no cost using the form below each summary. Requests made through this form are considered informal requests and are not subject to the same requirements as requests under the Access to Information Act (ATIA).
If you don’t find what you are looking for you can request additional government records under an institution’s control by contacting the institution’s Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator or by submitting a formal access to information request.
*All information provided will incorporate the necessary exemptions and exclusions as per the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act.
Download datasets of the summaries of completed access to information requests.
Current Search
Report Type
Organization
Disposition
Year
Month
Found 81 record(s)
Req # A-2021-00010
NADALINI PROPERTIES HOLDINGS INC. purchase from OSTERMARK HOLDINGS INC. LOT 52, PLAN 9001; CITY OF MARKHAM (being all of PIN 03003-0167 (LT)) 280 Telson Road, Markham, ON (the “Property”) Closing Date: As soon as possible Our File No.: 12446-002Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
0 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2020-00111
Requesting the following documents: Clinical Care Managers for Veterans with Complex Health Needs Distinctions Between Treatment Benefits and Medical or Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services FAQs: Case Planning (2011) Guidelines for Case Conferencing Guidelines for Case Planning Indicators for Referral: Case Management Support Services Indicator (SSI) - Steps for Activating and Deactivating Acceptance of Diagnoses from nurse practitioners for disability entitlement purposes Adjudication Manual Disability Pensions/Awards Medical Assessment and Reassessment Qualified Health Professionals Accepted for Veterans Affairs Canada Disability Program Cues for Referral of Treatment Requests Between VAC Area Offices and the Medical Authorization Centre (MAC) Decision Making and Use of the Benefit Grids Emergency Call Devices (ECDs) Health Related Travel – Veteran Contact Regarding Post Payment Verification Process How to Process a Request for a Benefit or Service when Client Does Not Have POC –interim Increased Decision making Authority under the Veterans Health Care Regulations for Case Managers How to Process Requests for Treatment/Intervention at Outpatient or Inpatient Multi-Disciplinary Clinics (MDCs) Increased Authority to Approve Home Adaptations and Special Equipment under the Veterans Health Care Benefits Program Payment of Health Premiums or Fees POC 7 - Neuro-muscular Electrical Stimulator POC 12 - All Related Health Services - Initial Approval & Exceeding Frequency and Annual Dollar Limits POC 12 - Neurofeedback: Modality Used by Approved Health Professionals POC 12 - Requests for Extensions and Maintenance Therapy POC 13 - Exercise Equipment POC 13 - Home or Self Use Neurofeedback, or EEG Biofeedback Machines POC 13 - Motorized Yard Equipment POC 13 - Orthopaedic/Posturepedic Mattress POC 13 - Special Equipment - Requirement for a Minimum of Two Quotes Prescription Drugs – Non Formulary Products Referrals to Head Office for Exceptional Health Care Services or Benefits Requirement to Access Provincial Programs Responding to Inquiries regarding Client Verification Letters sent out by the Medavie Blue Cross National Investigative Unit (NIU) Selection of Providers and Payment of Benefits Treatment Benefits or Services Inquiries Escalation Process Use of “Plain Language” Treatment Authorization Centre (TAC) Decision Letter Templates VAC Contribution Toward the Cost of a Treatment BenefitOrganization: Veterans Affairs Canada
350 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2020-00114
Veterans Affairs Canada is involved in promoting awareness and access to their benefits and services through social media. How does VAC conduct its social media feedback to ascertain the effectiveness of its media campaigns? Does this include the active monitoring of known veteran association webpages, Facebook pages and posts, Twitter hashtags and tweets, Instagram responses etc? Describe VAC's monitoring of social media to establish the effectiveness of its media awareness campaigns.Organization: Veterans Affairs Canada
2 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2020-00115
Could you please provide the following statistics: 1. Approximately how many CAF widows (survivors) there were as of 12-31-2014. 2. Approximately how many new CAF widows were designated as survivors in 2014. 3. The average of CAF survivors in 2014. 4. Approximately how many survivors there were in each the following age categories: under 20; 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60-69; 70-79; 80+ as of 12-31- 2014. 5. Approximately how many CAF dependents were entitled to survivor benefits from VAC as of 12-31-2014. 6. Approximately how many CAF widows (survivors) there are as of 03-31-2021 7. Approximately how many new CAF widows were designated as survivors in 2021. 8. The average age of CAF survivors in 2021. 9. Approximately how many survivors there are in each of the following age categories: under 20; 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60-69; 70-79; 80+ as of 03-31-2021. 10. Approximately how many CAF dependents are entitled to survivor benefits from VAC as of 03-31-2021. Additionally, could clarify who is included in the category "War Survivors"? Is this group comprised of widows from the Second World War and Korean War? Are CAF widows/survivors those who were widowed post Korean War?Organization: Veterans Affairs Canada
5 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2021-00002
Requesting all pertinent legislation and VAC policies dealing with B Line treatment benefits and how they are awarded to veterans. Responsive records should include policies dealing with: - veterans who are first awarded VIP benefits rooted in conditions attributable to SDA/SDO service, thus becoming eligible for B line coverage; and - veterans who are awarded conditions arising from non-SDA/SDO service and VIP is granted for those conditions, and the veteran later successfully claims a SDA/SDO-related disability that would (on its own) result in B line coverage. Specifically, seeking policy dealing with the process VAC follows, which leads to B line coverage.Organization: Veterans Affairs Canada
22 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2019-00130
Confirmation document, email sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering the Safety Areas mentioned in the Detailed Event Report for the event that occurred 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant for the following three instances, id es: (i) Safety Areas covering: (ii) Shutdown Systems and Safety Systems, and (iii) Training Program(s).Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
0 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00132
Clarified text on April 17, 2020: Emails were to be sent to Specialist(s), as follows: Safety Systems, Training Programs, Human Factors, and Quality Assurance. The causes identified in the preliminary and detailed reports describes a minimum number of specialist(s) that should have been informed via email of the Event by providing to them the R-99. We are reiterating our requests, as follows: Emails that forwarded the R-99 to specialists, Proof of receipt of emails to specialist, title of Experts, and Division to which they were attached to. In addition, kindly provide the ID Tag Number( specific identification, unique number) of the failed relay. Original text: Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Maintenance Program (Relays), deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
3 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00131
Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Shutdown System(s) and Safety Systems, deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
3 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00103
Provide January 1, 2019 to present, review of the handling work of Canada’s federally-owned radioactive waste by a private-sector consortium and options to consider as the renewal date in 2021 is near, including other options that store radioactive waste away from drinking water sources. Include permits given and rationales for and risk assessments done for transporting radioactive wastes to Chalk River and other sites, and to storing wastes at Chalk River. Include as well results to date from an environmental review of Global First Power plans for modular reactor at Chalk River and questions CNSC sent to them in the last 3 months.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
103 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00108
All records provided to or created by the president regarding the Pickering nuclear generating station from Jan. 1, 2020 to the date this request was received.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
33 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020