About this information
Search the summaries of completed Access to Information (ATI) requests to find information about ATI requests made to the Government of Canada after January 2020. If you find a summary of interest, you can request a copy of the records at no cost using the form below each summary. Requests made through this form are considered informal requests and are not subject to the same requirements as requests under the Access to Information Act (ATIA).
If you don’t find what you are looking for you can request additional government records under an institution’s control by contacting the institution’s Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator or by submitting a formal access to information request.
*All information provided will incorporate the necessary exemptions and exclusions as per the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act.
Download datasets of the summaries of completed access to information requests.
Current Search
Report Type
Organization
Disposition
Year
Month
Found 77 record(s)
Req # A-2021-00009
Grays Cavern Developments Inc. (the “Purchaser”) PURCHASE FROM: (1) Millford Development Limited, Charter Construction Limited, Forsite Homes Limited and Mod-Aire Homes Limited of the lands and premises legally described as: (a) PT LT 23-24 CON 4 OPS PT 1 TO 7 57R5698 EXCEPT PL 633; S/T VT71316; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN GROSS OVER PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS, PT 8 57R10019 AS IN KL65800; CITY OF KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0008) with Roll No. 165101000388400 ( “Property 1”); (2) Antonio Orsi of the lands and premises legally described as: (a) PT LT 24 CON 4 OPS PT 3 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0006 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000396000; (b) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 6 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0010 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000395700; and (c) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 9 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0013 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000395400 (collectively, “Property 2”); (3) [name withheld] of the lands and premises legally described as: (a) PT LT 24 CON 4 OPS PT 2 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0005 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000396100; (b) PT LT 23-24 CON 4 OPS PT 5 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204- 0009 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000395800; (c) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 8 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0012 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000395500; and (d) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 11 TO 13 57R2016; S/T VT71316; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0015 (LT)) with Roll No. 165101000395200 (collectively, “Property 3”); (4) Luigi Orsi of the lands and premises legally described as: (a) PT LT 24 CON 4 OPS PT 1 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0004) with Roll No. 165101000396200; (b) PT LT 24 CON 4 OPS PT 4 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0007) with Roll No. 165101000395900; (c) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 7 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0011) with Roll No. 165101000395600; and (d) PT LT 23 CON 4 OPS PT 10 57R2016; KAWARTHA LAKES (being all of PIN 63204-0014) with Roll No. 165101000395300 (collectively, “Property 4” and together with Priperty 1, Property 2 and Property 3, the “Property”), all pursuant to a agreement of purchase and sale dated the 29th day of December, 2020 (the “Purchase Agreement”) Our File No.: 3900678Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
0 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # A-2021-00010
NADALINI PROPERTIES HOLDINGS INC. purchase from OSTERMARK HOLDINGS INC. LOT 52, PLAN 9001; CITY OF MARKHAM (being all of PIN 03003-0167 (LT)) 280 Telson Road, Markham, ON (the “Property”) Closing Date: As soon as possible Our File No.: 12446-002Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
0 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # 20-2045
1. As of January 2020, how many persons occupy a management position at the Halifax station who are part of the four following categories: (i) women, (ii) visible minorities, (iii) person with a disability or (iv) identify as aboriginal. Please provide their position and title; 2. As of January 2020, how many persons occupy a management position at the Halifax station who are not part of the four categories mentioned in question 1; 3. Please indicate how long each employee occupying a management position at the Halifax station has been in their role; 4. In the event that an employee in a managerial role was required to conduct an investigation at the Halifax station, was such role ever occupied by a visible minority and in the event that an employee in a managerial role was required to conduct an investigation at the Halifax station, have they received a training related to visible minorities/sensitivity training; 5. For employees employed at the Halifax station subject to Unifor Collective Agreement #1, please provide the number (in total) of demerit points that have been deducted as of January 2008. If possible, please differentiate between the following categories: (i) women, (ii) visible minorities, (iii) person with a disability, (iv) identify as aboriginal and (v) Caucasian; 6. Please provide documentation regarding action VIA Rail has taken to cultivate diversity, equity and inclusion training in the workplace at the Halifax station; 7. Please provide documentation regarding the opportunities given to women, visible minorities, those with a disability and those who identify as aboriginal to achieve management position roles at VIA Rail and more specifically the Halifax station (regards to implementing, reviewing, monitoring and revising and employment equity plan that includes short term and long term goals to close gaps in representation); 8. For each employee currently occupying a management role at the Halifax station, please provide copy of their respective job posting; 9. In the event of any external contractor hired by VIA Rail in 2019 to conduct investigations with employees in Agreement #1, what was the cost for each contractor; 10. Please provide the calendar date(s) for each of the 11 witnesses interviewed for the report prepared for VIA Rail on September 27, 2019.Organization: VIA Rail Canada Inc.
21 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # 20-2050
I am looking for copies of VIA Rail’s brand/corporate identity guidelines and rolling stock livery guidelines used throughout VIA Rail’s history. The brand/corporate identity guidelines contain information on the correct usage of VIA Rail’s logo as well as the specific colours used as part of the company’s corporate identity.Organization: VIA Rail Canada Inc.
63 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Req # 20-2052
Obtain a copy of any document held by VIA Rail that allows me to see the total amounts spent in relation to COVID-19 and/or the pandemic between February 28, 2020 and February 28, 2021 (including all forms of expenses): a. tell me the number of contracts awarded solely related to the pandemic/COVID-19, vaccines, etc. and the total values of all such contracts; b. tell me the number of hours and total amount of overtime you paid to employees/officials; c. tell me all equipment/materials purchased by VIA Rail related to the pandemic/COVID-19 including telework, iPad/tablet/laptops etc. masks, gloves, plexiglass, etc.; d. I absolutely want a clear answer: the total amount encompassing all the expenses made by VIA Rail related to this pandemic/COVID-19 from February 28, 2020 to February 28, 2021.Organization: VIA Rail Canada Inc.
3 page(s)
April 2021
April 2021
Nothing to report this month
Organization: Communications Security Establishment Canada
April 2021
Req # A-2019-00130
Confirmation document, email sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering the Safety Areas mentioned in the Detailed Event Report for the event that occurred 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant for the following three instances, id es: (i) Safety Areas covering: (ii) Shutdown Systems and Safety Systems, and (iii) Training Program(s).Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
0 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00132
Clarified text on April 17, 2020: Emails were to be sent to Specialist(s), as follows: Safety Systems, Training Programs, Human Factors, and Quality Assurance. The causes identified in the preliminary and detailed reports describes a minimum number of specialist(s) that should have been informed via email of the Event by providing to them the R-99. We are reiterating our requests, as follows: Emails that forwarded the R-99 to specialists, Proof of receipt of emails to specialist, title of Experts, and Division to which they were attached to. In addition, kindly provide the ID Tag Number( specific identification, unique number) of the failed relay. Original text: Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Maintenance Program (Relays), deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
3 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00131
Confirmation document, email, containing at least two Reports were sent to the Technical Specialist(s) covering Shutdown System(s) and Safety Systems, deemed qualified, and preparing the Gentillly II Nuclear Power Plant Integrated Safety Review (ISR) mandated by the IAEA; the two Reports are, as follows: Preliminary Event Report and the Detailed Event Report ; these two Reports covered the event that occurred on 27 October, 2009, at Gentilly II Nuclear Power Plant.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
3 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020
Req # A-2019-00103
Provide January 1, 2019 to present, review of the handling work of Canada’s federally-owned radioactive waste by a private-sector consortium and options to consider as the renewal date in 2021 is near, including other options that store radioactive waste away from drinking water sources. Include permits given and rationales for and risk assessments done for transporting radioactive wastes to Chalk River and other sites, and to storing wastes at Chalk River. Include as well results to date from an environmental review of Global First Power plans for modular reactor at Chalk River and questions CNSC sent to them in the last 3 months.Organization: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
103 page(s)
April 2020
April 2020